RAC Storage Case Study –Fiber Channel Vs. NFS

Maclean Liu(刘相兵

RAC Storage Options
ASM on Raw –Common
Clustered Filesystem–> Linux -OCFS2
-Other OS –dual clusterware !
Raw Devices --Unpopular
NFS –Uncommon, relies on NFS server
Direct NFS –new in 11G
OCR, Voting Disks –needs RAW or NFS ( or ASM for 11GR2 )


RAC Storage Case Study –Fiber Channel Vs. NFS.pdf (1.71 MB, 下载次数: 4, 售价: 5 金钱)

2012-2-9 22:54 上传

点击文件名下载附件
售价: 5 金钱  [记录]

Our Fiber Channel/NFS Choice
FC SAN ( Virtualized,Shared )
NFS (Direct, Physical )
CannotUse “Snap” Tools Easily
Easy “Snap” Integration
Higher Performance per CPU
CPUOverhead (less in11g DNFS)
Host Filesystemor ASM
NFS Filesystem
Bandwidth -4 GB/S
1 GbE/ 10GbE
Requires ASM for RAC
ASM notneeded
Expensive HBA, FC switches
Stability concerns(improved in V3)
But Remember…..
Performance SLA is the Key
Maintenance, DR, Cost of Support, Training, Manpower

zhuqibs

SAN和iscsi的对比啊，不错啊

aiirii

不知道内容如何，这个细节很多ＤＢＡ没怎么留意

1112061

赶紧学习下，谢谢。。。

casper0511

感谢分享，学习！！！！！

hzcyhujw

最近在学习RAC 顺便看下存储的知识