- 最后登录
- 2016-6-27
- 在线时间
- 134 小时
- 威望
- 351
- 金钱
- 2586
- 注册时间
- 2012-3-16
- 阅读权限
- 60
- 帖子
- 188
- 精华
- 6
- 积分
- 351
- UID
- 309
|
1#
发表于 2013-6-3 17:15:11
|
查看: 3497 |
回复: 2
Load Profile
| Per Second | Per Transaction | Redo size: | 44,651.64 | 7,595.11 | Logical reads: | 152,770.06 | 25,985.74 | Block changes: | 159.07 | 27.06 | Physical reads: | 2,685.41 | 456.78 | Physical writes: | 96.42 | 16.40 | User calls: | 4,909.25 | 835.05 | Parses: | 1,026.06 | 174.53 | Hard parses: | 18.57 | 3.16 | Sorts: | 55.59 | 9.46 | Logons: | 911.99 | 155.13 | Executes: | 1,111.61 | 189.08 | Transactions: | 5.88 | |
Top 5 Timed Events
Event | Waits | Time(s) | Avg Wait(ms) | % Total Call Time | Wait Class | CPU time | | 43,444 | | 4.7 | | latch: cache buffers chains | 6,434,918 | 14,987 | 2 | 1.6 | Concurrency | latch: library cache | 137,747 | 4,116 | 30 | .4 | Concurrency | PX Deq Credit: send blkd | 2,005,501 | 3,855 | 2 | .4 | Other | latch: row cache objects | 92,550 | 3,204 | 35 | .3 | Concurrency |
Time Model Statistics- Total time in database user-calls (DB Time): 921961.4s
- Statistics including the word "background" measure background process time, and so do not contribute to the DB time statistic
- Ordered by % or DB time desc, Statistic name
Statistic Name | Time (s) | % of DB Time | sql execute elapsed time | 45,134.71 | 4.90 | DB CPU | 43,443.63 | 4.71 | parse time elapsed | 9,175.67 | 1.00 | hard parse elapsed time | 803.34 | 0.09 | PL/SQL execution elapsed time | 41.97 | 0.00 | hard parse (sharing criteria) elapsed time | 7.22 | 0.00 | PL/SQL compilation elapsed time | 4.92 | 0.00 | connection management call elapsed time | 2.43 | 0.00 | hard parse (bind mismatch) elapsed time | 0.21 | 0.00 | failed parse elapsed time | 0.21 | 0.00 | repeated bind elapsed time | 0.18 | 0.00 | sequence load elapsed time | 0.16 | 0.00 | DB time | 921,961.37 | | background elapsed time | 533.26 | | background cpu time | 134.23 | |
两个问题:
1)为什么每秒登录900多次,但从connection management call elapsed time看消耗在连接上的时间才2秒?
2)从top5和time model看顶级时间加起来的百分比不到10%,其他的DB TIME消耗到哪去了?难道全部都在CPU的等待队列上了?
|
|