- 最后登录
- 2023-8-16
- 在线时间
- 1686 小时
- 威望
- 2135
- 金钱
- 50532
- 注册时间
- 2011-10-12
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 帖子
- 5207
- 精华
- 39
- 积分
- 2135
- UID
- 2
|
2#
发表于 2012-3-1 12:19:00
ODM Finding:- Lun Size And Performance Impact With Asm [ID 373242.1]
- Applies to:
- Oracle Server - Enterprise Edition - Version: 10.2.0.2 and later [Release: 10.2 and later ]
- Information in this document applies to any platform.
- ***Checked for relevance on 27-Feb-2011***
- Goal
- QUESTION
- What is the maximum LUN size we can use without performance degradation? For example, is 1 TB or 2TB sized LUNs perform the same as 100 GB or 200 GB sized LUNs?
- We are using the ASM feature of Oracle DB 10g release 2 on 64-bit Solaris 9 or Solaris 10.
- Solution
- ANSWER
- Size alone should not affect the performance of a LUN. The underlying hardware is what counts. There is no magic number for the LUN size. Seek the advice of the storage vendor to recommend the best configuration from a raid 1 or 5 perspective for performance and availability since this may vary between vendors. Given a database size and storage hardware you have available, our best practice recommends creating larger LUNs (if possible to reduce LUN management for the sys admins) and create LUNs from separate set of storage arrays (drives) so that LUNs are not sharing drives if possible.
- For larger LUNs it is recommended using a large ALLOCATION UNIT.
复制代码 |
|