- 最后登录
- 2023-8-16
- 在线时间
- 1686 小时
- 威望
- 2135
- 金钱
- 50532
- 注册时间
- 2011-10-12
- 阅读权限
- 200
- 帖子
- 5207
- 精华
- 39
- 积分
- 2135
- UID
- 2
|
2#
发表于 2015-5-17 20:41:33
你可以认为波动期内系统已经hang了 分析log file sync单个等待事件没啥意义
Event Waits Time(s) Avg wait (ms) % DB time Wait Class
gc buffer busy acquire 535,403 323,746 605 28.34 Cluster
log file sync 750,532 228,804 305 20.03 Commit
buffer busy waits 242,080 202,202 835 17.70 Concurrency
library cache lock 16,897 149,282 8835 13.07 Concurrency
gc cr block busy 319,236 58,825 184 5.15 Cluster
tatistic Name Time (s) % of DB Time
sql execute elapsed time 778,131.14 68.12
connection management call elapsed time 162,396.91 14.22
DB CPU 16,600.36 1.45
parse time elapsed 1,648.53 0.14
sequence load elapsed time 895.77 0.08
hard parse elapsed time 328.93 0.03
PL/SQL execution elapsed time 290.99 0.03
hard parse (sharing criteria) elapsed time 54.51 0.00
hard parse (bind mismatch) elapsed time 28.81 0.00
failed parse elapsed time 5.07 0.00
PL/SQL compilation elapsed time 0.37 0.00
repeated bind elapsed time 0.07 0.00
DB time 1,142,367.48
background elapsed time 16,449.22
background cpu time 2,719.93
Global Cache and Enqueue Services - Workload Characteristics
Avg global enqueue get time (ms): 40.6
Avg global cache cr block receive time (ms): 65.0
Avg global cache current block receive time (ms): 11.7
Avg global cache cr block build time (ms): 0.0
Avg global cache cr block send time (ms): 0.0
Global cache log flushes for cr blocks served %: 10.2
Avg global cache cr block flush time (ms): 1,664.2
Avg global cache current block pin time (ms): 0.2
Avg global cache current block send time (ms): 0.0
Global cache log flushes for current blocks served %: 0.5
Avg global cache current block flush time (ms): 1,870.9
Global Cache and Enqueue Services - Messaging Statistics
Avg message sent queue time (ms): 0.1
Avg message sent queue time on ksxp (ms): 8.7
Avg message received queue time (ms): 0.0
Avg GCS message process time (ms): 0.0
Avg GES message process time (ms): 0.1
% of direct sent messages: 49.50
% of indirect sent messages: 49.49
% of flow controlled messages: 1.01 |
|